R.S Seright, F.D. Martin – 1992
Abstract
This paper tests key assumptions used in calculations of non-Newtonian gel placement in injection wells for Cr(III)-xanthan gels in Berea sandstone. Three assumptions are tested: whether pre-gelation porous-media rheology is unaffected by Cr(III) addition; whether post-gelation residual resistance factors are independent of fluid velocity; and whether gel is immobile under flow. Results: Cr(III) at 90 ppm does not significantly alter xanthan rheology before gelation. After gelation, residual resistance factors are NOT velocity-independent — they increase at higher velocities. The validity of this assumption in prior gel placement calculations is thus challenged
Key Takeaways
- Cr(III) addition at 90 ppm does not significantly alter xanthan rheology in porous media before gelation — the pre-gelation flow behavior can be characterized from xanthan-only measurements, simplifying placement calculation inputs.
- After gelation, residual resistance factors for Cr(III)-xanthan gels are NOT independent of fluid velocity — they increase at higher velocities, violating a common assumption in gel placement calculations.
- Velocity-dependent post-gelation RRF means near-wellbore (high-velocity) and deep-reservoir (low-velocity) gel performance differ — constant-RRF placement calculations will misrepresent the actual treatment profile.
- Gel mobility under flow conditions is a critical assumption for placement calculations — if gel is mobile, placement predictions based on immobile gel assumptions will be incorrect.
- These experiments define which assumptions in non-Newtonian gel placement calculations are valid and which require revision — providing a more reliable mechanistic foundation for injection well gel treatment design.
Related Articles
Testing an Improved Method to Determine Inaccessible Pore Volume
April 11, 2026
No Comments
Evaluation And Lessons Learned from Water Shut-off Treatments in Kuwait Reservoirs
April 11, 2026
No Comments