R.S. Seright – 2003
Abstract
Second year of the conformance improvement project. X-ray CT data from previous work is re-analyzed using indicator kriging fluid segmentation, addressing critic concerns about pore size distributions. Core findings are confirmed and refined. A field gel treatment in an Arbuckle production well is analyzed, demonstrating laboratory-to-field translation of gel permeability reduction predictions. DPR in fractures is quantified: water/oil permeability ratios exceeding 89 are measured for fracture-resident gels. Partially formed gels and gels with mixed-molecular-weight polymers in fractures are characterized. Gel volume reduction in oil-wet porous polyethylene is driven by a dehydration mechanism rather than a gel-ripping mechanism.
Key Takeaways
- Re-analysis with indicator kriging confirms the core finding: oil trapping drives DPR in water-wet Berea sandstone; a dehydration mechanism (not oil trapping or gel ripping) drives DPR in oil-wet polyethylene.
- Fracture-resident gels can provide DPR water/oil permeability ratios exceeding 89 — a result that substantially extends DPR technology to fracture-dominated production well applications.
- An Arbuckle production well field case confirms that laboratory gel propagation model predictions translate successfully to field-scale productivity and pressure changes.
- Gel volume reduction in oil-wet polyethylene pores is driven by a gel dehydration mechanism, not gel ripping — an important mechanistic clarification based on pore-size-resolved analysis.
- Gels with mixed high- and low-molecular-weight HPAM show different extrusion and dehydration behaviors, offering new design flexibility for fracture treatment applications.
Related Articles
Testing an Improved Method to Determine Inaccessible Pore Volume
April 11, 2026
No Comments
Evaluation And Lessons Learned from Water Shut-off Treatments in Kuwait Reservoirs
April 11, 2026
No Comments