Randall S. Seright, Dongmei Wang – 2023

Abstract

At the Milne Point polymer flood, polymer retention is dominated by illite clay. Illite and kaolinite do not delay polymer propagation but reduce effective polymer concentration and viscosity by approximately 30%, reducing oil displacement efficiency until full injected concentration is regained over several pore volumes. This work shows polymer retention on illite is insensitive to monovalent ion concentration but increases significantly with increased divalent cation concentration. Incorporating a small percentage of ATBS monomers into HPAM dramatically reduces retention. An extensive literature review reveals that polymer retention on sands and sandstones is only modestly sensitive to the presence of oil. Review of inaccessible pore volume (IAPV) literature suggests IAPV was commonly substantially overestimated, especially in rock more permeable than 500 md — which comprises the vast majority of current polymer flood targets. Bridging adsorption is proposed as the mechanism linking divalent cation concentration and retention.

Key Takeaways

  • Polymer retention at Milne Point is dominated by illite clay — illite and kaolinite do not delay polymer bank arrival but reduce effective effluent polymer concentration by approximately 30%, reducing displacement efficiency until concentration is recovered over several pore volumes.
  • Polymer retention on illite is insensitive to monovalent ion (NaCl) concentration but increases significantly with increased divalent cation (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺) concentration — a critical distinction for polymer flood design in hardwater reservoirs.
  • Incorporating a small percentage of ATBS monomers into HPAM dramatically reduces polymer retention on illite, offering a practical formulation strategy to lower retention costs in clay-dominated formations.
  • Polymer retention on sands and sandstones is only modestly sensitive to the presence of residual oil — formation wettability is not a dominant retention driver in permeable rock above 100 md.
  • Inaccessible pore volume (IAPV) has been substantially overestimated in most literature for permeable rock above 500 md — a conservative assumption of IAPV ≈ 0 is appropriate for the vast majority of current polymer flood targets.

Related Articles